CHILD SUPPORT AND SPOUSAL SUPPORT
ISSUE: Wife hired Provinziano & Associates because husband lied about his earning ability and claimed that he was fired shortly after filing for divorce.
RESULT: After a court trial, court found that husband was not credible and ordered him to pay lifetime support.
ISSUE: Ex-wife went to child support authorities claiming that my client had not paid over $70,000 in child support without any supporting documentation.
RESULT: After going to court for my client, child support refused to enforce wife’s case and client ultimately settled for $5,000.00.
ISSUE: Ex-wife had filed contempt for failure to pay non-modifiable spousal support from client when he hired Provinziano & Associates after being served while suffering from illness and disability.
RESULT: Contempt dismissed. Case settled for approximately 20% of what he allegedly owed to ex-wife.
ISSUE: Wife hired Provinziano & Associates after husband left her with no support and multiple children.
RESULT: After emergency ex parte, court heard the matter and ordered child and spousal support within five days.
ISSUE: Wife hired Provinziano & Associates after husband severely beat her for years and then left her with no property or personal possessions.
RESULT: Court ordered lifetime spousal support, half of her retirement for life (valued at $500,000), husband to pay her restitution for replacement of her property and living expenses while fleeing his domestic violence, and husband ordered to pay all debt from marriage.
ISSUE: Wife hired Provinziano & Associates to enforce a judgment in her favor from ex-husband in the amount of $90,000.
RESULT: Case settled with payment in full to client in exchange for waiver of attorney’s fees.
ISSUE: Client hired Provinziano & Associates because on again and off again husband had not paid support to her in ten years despite court order.
RESULT: Court ordered judgment in the amount of $100,000.00 plus statutory interest.
ISSUE: Client hired Provinziano & Associates because ex-wife had re-married and never told him. Our client had paid support that he never should have for years.
RESULT: Court ordered our client to be reimbursed in an amount over $40,000.00 plus statutory interest.
ISSUE: Father recently got out of the army and income vastly reduced but support orders did not change and were consuming approximately 90% of his take home pay.
RESULT: Court ordered a modification of support in favor of our client, reducing support obligation to approximately 20% of his pay.
ISSUE: Husband had wife that made a substantial amount of money, while he had stayed home to take care of the house and children.
RESULT: Despite husband’s advanced degree, the court held that his being out of the work force for a number of years reduced his earning capacity and awarded him child and spousal support.
ISSUE: Husband agreed to pay $2,000 a month spousal support to wife in judgment, which did not take into account his care for adult children in the marriage.
RESULT: After a court trial, court considered fact that Husband was caring for adult children, and reduced spousal support to $1,000 a month – effectively cutting spousal support in half.